2012-06-01
African Union calls for UN-backed Mali intervention
By Jemal Oumar and Raby Ould Idoumou for Magharebia in Nouakchott – 01/06/12
African Union (AU) President Thomas Boni Yayi on Wednesday (May 30th) called for the UN support to a military intervention to resolve the crisis in Mali's Azawad region.
"We are proposing that the AU strengthen its position so that its Peace and Security Council can refer the matter to the UN Security Council," the Benin President and AU chief said in Paris.
"We do not want a west African Afghanistan," Boni Yayi said. "The question of stability is non-negotiable for us."
Boni Yayi was in Paris to discuss the issue with newly-elected French President François Hollande, who said that France would participate, but only in the "framework of a UN Security Council resolution", AP reported.
"Countries threatened with terrorism in Sahel, such as Algeria, Mauritania and Libya, must be involved in the resolutions that aim to combat this terrorism," Boni Yayi said, outlining his plan for a UN-supported African force similar to the intervention in Somalia.
In a press conference following the two leader's closed-door meeting on Tuesday, the president declared that the AU wouldn't give up on its support for the Malian government whose northern provinces were controlled by militant Islamic groups Ansar al-Din group and the secular National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA).
The European Union joined the African Union Wednesday (May 30th) in rejecting the "declaration of independence" which was issued by the groups that control northern Mali, confirming their "determination" to preserve Mali's territorial integrity, and strongly condemning "human rights violations in northern Mali by rebels, armed groups and terrorists".
"The declaration of independence which was issued by MNLA is invalid and is deemed to have never existed," the EU and AU said in a joint statement at the end of their 5th annual security and political committees meetings in Brussels, reiterating "their commitment to preserve Mali's unity and territorial integrity".
Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) President Désiré Ouedraogo Kadré said Monday (May 28th) that the bloc would do it best to preserve Mali's territorial integrity and ensure stability in its rebel-controlled northern provinces.
According to analysts, the call for international support in the Mali crisis is justified.
"The world can't accept any aggression on the soil of an independent state," Mauritanian journalist and analyst Abdallah al-Fath told Magharebia.
"The Azawad illusory state is now facing international isolation and threats posed by terrorist organisations that took advantage of the rebellion to consolidate their positions in Azawad," he said.
"We have agreed to step up pressures," said Olof Skoog, Permanent Chair of the EU's Political and Security Committee.
Mohamed Ould al-Yidali, editor-in-chief of Sada al-Ahdas daily said: "Africa and Europe put rebel movements that ally with al-Qaeda in an impasse and blame them for events in northern Mali and the consequences that may result from them."
"Azawad people's demands may be negotiable, but an alliance with al-Qaeda is rejected by all international forces. That is where danger lies in Mali," he explained.
In his turn, Mohamed Ould Sid Ahmed Val, a Mauritanian researcher and a professor of sociology at Nouakchott University, said in an interview with islamtimes.org that the crisis in Mali has evolved into what he described as "an internationally marketable idea".
"European states may be prepared to provide logistical support to field countries to help realise stability and prosperity in the region," he said. He added this was particularly true after the "occupation by al-Qaeda and jihadist groups in recent years, and especially after the latest developments and failure of Mali's consecutive governments to control it," he said.
Subscribe to our newsletter and get Magharebia's latest articles delivered to your inbox.

![[Jemal Oumar] The African Union is calling for the UN to support military action in northern Mali.](/awi/images/2012/06/01/120601Feature1Photo1-271_179.jpg)
POST YOUR COMMENT 5
anonymus 2012-6-7
Here as elsewhere – in principle and in general – everyone is “offering a view” and giving his opinion. That goes without saying. But, certain people like Yacine take care to specify “This is an opinion”. What are we supposed to get from that – that there are two heads here? That he does not always give his opinion? Well in whose name is he speaking? This is all so very exciting!
0 Likes
anonymous 2012-6-3
This is not the African Union, but Ouattara and Compraoré – the boys of Françafrique.
0 Likes
africain 2012-6-2
The African union does not represent the Africans, let alone the interests of the African peoples. The African Union is but the expression of Françafrique domination. These states are almost all deprived of their sovereignty in sensitive areas like currency (CFA), diplomacy and defence. How can this union speak legitimately in the name of the Africans and ask for foreign interventions like the one it asked for in the African country of Mali? That such an intervention is under the aegis of the United Nations gives it no more validity because the UN bodies are marked by the same defect of hegemony in the service of the Club of Three. No, the Africans are not represented by the African Union and they refuse foreign military interventions, including the one labelled “UN” in Mali. The disastrous precedents are manifest, but the lessons have not been learned because these same forces are leading the world for their own daemonic interests alone. No to the intervention under the UN’s aegis in Mali or anywhere else in Africa! May the United Nations’ Secretary General take responsibility before the Eternal for once!
0 Likes
anonymous 2012-6-2
Unblock this forum please...
0 Likes
Yacine 2012-6-2
A military intervention in northern Mali as suggested makes no sense for the following reasons: (1) The African Union does not have adequate means to fight against the armed groups raging in northern Mali; (2) should there be a massive deployment of African troops – for which we would need to find the necessary officers – there is a risk of ethnic-based massacre (blacks against whites); (3) the armed groups have enormous capacities in terms of movement given that their troops are deployed and they (the terrorists) are moving toward Libya and Algeria, two territories that are not under the control of their governments and/or where the terrorists have accomplices; (4) control of northern Mali, northern Niger and southern Algeria suggest, first and foremost, control of watering and re-fuelling points, but do the troops of the African Union and these so-called field countries have the ability to do this? The solution, in my opinion, is first of all political, which is equivalent to noting that we need to first get the Malian government and its army back on its feet, convince the Touaregs that their interests are closely tied to the stability of the so-called field countries and not to reinforcing the AQIM terrorists capacity to do harm. (5) Without the military and financial support of Europe and the USA, this region will be turned into a Somalia and Afghanistan. This is just my point of view.
0 Likes